Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Number of respondents by age and sex.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Basic attributes of the three datasets.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of respondents’ children and parents.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Experimental procedure for investigating nudging messages for recycling disposable plastics.

The black dashed boxes show the interventions. The targets of the interventions are highlighted with red dashed boxes.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Message presented to the control group.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Message presented to treatment group 1.

The intervention is highlighted with red rectangles.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Message presented to those under 50 years of age in treatment group 2.

The intervention is highlighted with red rectangles.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Message presented to those 50 years of age and older in treatment group 2.

The intervention is highlighted with red rectangles.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of interventions.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

Risk perception on disposable plastics by group before receiving the designed messages.

Higher values on the vertical axis indicate higher perceived risks. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals. CG, control group; T1, treatment group 1; T2, treatment group 2; Fut, Future Generations; You, Yourself.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Daily COVID-19 cases per million people by country from February 10 to March 5, 2021.

Retrieved from [38], the dataset of which is based on the COVID-19 Data Repository of the Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Fear about COVID-19 by group.

Higher values on the vertical axis indicate higher perceived danger of COVID-19. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals. CG, control group; T1, treatment group 1; T2, treatment group 2.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Perception by group that COVID-19 threatens the respondents’ family and relatives.

Higher values on the vertical axis indicate higher perceived danger. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals. CG, control group; T1, treatment group 1; T2, treatment group 2.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Post-intervention effect in attitude change toward disposable plastics (D).

Higher values on the vertical axis indicate lower perceived danger of disposable plastics. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals. CG, control group; T1, treatment group 1; T2, treatment group 2; Fut, Future Generations; You, Yourself.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Perception that the respondent has benefited from the actions of relatives belonging to older generations after receiving one of the nudge message interventions.

Error bars show 95% confidence intervals. CG, control group; T1, treatment group 1; T2, treatment group 2.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Perception that the respondents’ younger relatives have benefited from disposable plastics after receiving one of the nudge message interventions.

Error bars show 95% confidence intervals. CG, control group; T1, treatment group 1; T2, treatment group 2.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 4.

Correlation coefficients between post-intervention effect in attitude change (D) and perceptions of benefiting from the older generations.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Correlation coefficients between post-intervention effect in attitude change (D) and perceptions that younger relatives are benefiting rom disposable plastics.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 14.

Post-intervention effect in attitude change toward disposable plastics (D) by sex.

Error bars show 95% confidence intervals. Higher values on the vertical axis indicate lower perceived danger of plastic recycling. CG, control group; T1, treatment group 1; T2, treatment group 2; Fut, Future Generations; You, Yourself; M, men; W, women.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Post-intervention effect in attitude change toward disposable plastics (D) by age.

Error bars show 95% confidence intervals. Higher values on the vertical axis indicate lower perceived danger of plastic recycling. CG, control group; T1, treatment group 1; T2, treatment group 2; Fut, Future Generations; You, Yourself; Y, respondents under the age of 50 years; O, respondents 50 years of age and older.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 6.

Coefficients from linear regression analysis.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Characteristic responses for CG.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Characteristic responses for T1.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Characteristic responses for T2.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Characteristic responses from respondents whose Cfamily was high.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Responses suggesting long-term intervention effects.

More »

Table 11 Expand