Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

High-speed train (CRH380) interior environment and seats.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Seat size parameters (unit: Mm).

(a) Side view and (b) Front view.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Experimental protocol and sample information.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Histogram of subject’s height and weight distribution.

(a) Height distribution (unit: mm) and (b) Weight distribution (unit: kg).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Basic information of participants in Program 2.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Three views of eight cushion geometry designs (unit: Cm).

(a) Flat cushions and (b) Wrapped cushions.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Production process photos.

(a) Sanding (b) Gauze bandage.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Eight kinds of contoured cushion production molding.

(a) Flat cushions and (b) Wrapped cushions.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Schematic diagram of the body perception area below the test waist.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

7-point likert scales.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Tekscan production pressure distribution measurement system.

(a) Pressure distribution test sensor and (b) Pressures measurement and display.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

The overall comfort rating score for eight cushion contours averaged over 97 participants, bars with the same letter superscript represent the significant difference (p<0.05).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 3.

Local body region comfort rating variables (values in parentheses indicate a standard error).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 11.

Histogram of average flat cushion comfort scores for three kinds of stature.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 4.

Overall body region discomfort rating variables (values in parentheses indicate a standard error).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 12.

Histogram of average flat cushion comfort scores for three kinds of stature.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Statistical histogram of pressure distribution parameters of flat cushion under three kinds of stature.

(a) Average contact area under three kinds of stature, (b) Average contact pressure under three kinds of stature, and (c) Average peak contact pressure under three kinds of stature.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Body-cushion contact pressure distribution cloud map.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 5.

Objective experimental test values at three stature under flat cushions (values in parentheses indicate a standard error).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 15.

Statistical histogram of pressure distribution parameters of wrapped cushion under three kinds of stature.

(a) Average contact area under three kinds of stature, (b) Average contact pressure under three kinds of stature, and (c) Average peak contact pressure under three kinds of stature.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 6.

Objective experimental test values at three stature under wrapped cushions (values in parentheses indicate a standard error).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Subjective and objective evaluation index value on S8.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Pearson correlation coefficients of the subjective ratings and pressure variables.

More »

Table 8 Expand