Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The methodological analysis of the proposed research study.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

The maternal health dataset features related information.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The maternal health dataset features related information.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

The dataset features distribution analysis concerning correlation to risk levels.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Statistical analysis of dataset features for correlation.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

3D analysis of prominent features concerning maternal pregnancy risk level and age.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The pair plot analysis of dataset features.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Number of samples for the dataset, (a) Before resampling, and (b) After applying SMOTE for resampling.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Graphical illustration of hybrid feature set using proposed DT-BiLTCN.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The maternal health risk analysis and BiLTCN model risk prediction.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 3.

The proposed BiLTCN model configuration parameters.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 9.

The architectural layers analysis of the BiLTCN approach.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 4.

The proposed model compilation parameters with hyperparameter tuning.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Comparative analysis of accuracy score of employed approaches based on original dataset features with imbalanced data.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Comparative analysis of the accuracy of employed approaches based on original dataset features using SMOTE-balanced data.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Training accuracy and loss of BiLTCN concerning the number of iterations.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Results for the BiLTCN for all classes.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

BiLTCN model results with hyperparameter tuning.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 10.

ROC curve accuracy analysis of BiLTCN.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

BiLTCN approach performance analysis.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 10.

Averaged results of models using the proposed DT-BiLTCN feature extraction technique with the imbalanced dataset.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Averaged results of applied learning models using the proposed DT-BiLTCN feature extraction technique.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

SVM category-wise classification report.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

Comparative analysis of DT and BiLTCN as feature extraction techniques.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Fig 12.

Comparative analysis of proposed DT-BiLTCN feature extraction with DT and BiLTCN.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 14.

The 10-fold cross-validation analysis of employed approaches with proposed DT-BiLTCN technique.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Fig 13.

The feature space analysis is based on class distribution using the original features and class distribution using the proposed DTBiLTCN.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 15.

The computational cost analysis (time in seconds) of machine learning methods.

More »

Table 15 Expand

Table 16.

Performance analysis with existing approaches.

More »

Table 16 Expand