Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The difference between traditional pooling method and the proposed pooling method.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

MaxPooling of three different matrices is the same.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Vector pooling block.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Example of calculating max-pooling and average pooling with filter of size 2X2 and stride 2.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

Dataset description.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 6.

Examples of segmentation process with U-Net before and after using the proposed pooling blocks.

(a) original images. (b) labels. (c)segmentation with U-Net. (d)segmentation with U-Net+VPB. (e) segmentation with U-Net+ AVG-MAX VPB.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Illustrative chart for the evaluation metrics of the semantic segmentation process with U-net before and after using the VPB and AVG-MAX VPB presented in Table 2.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 2.

Semantic segmentation evaluation metrics of U-net before and after using VPB and AVG-MAX VPB.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 8.

Illustrative chart for the accuracy results for three CNNs before and after using VPB and AVG-MAX VPB presented in Table 3.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Illustrative chart for the sensitivity results for three CNNs before and after using VPB and AVG-MAX VPB presented in Table 3.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Illustrative chart for the specificity results for three CNNs before and after using VPB and AVG-MAX VPB presented in Table 3.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 3.

Evaluation metrics of the classification process on three CNNs before and after using the VPB and the AVG-MAX VPB.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison with other studies on breast cancer detection with CNNs.

More »

Table 4 Expand