Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The process of feature extraction.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The form of feature vector.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Feature classification.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The system architecture of the proposed approach.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Densely concatenated convolution.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The architecture of the proposed model based on DenseNet.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

The parameters of the constructed model based on DenseNet.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The details of the dataset.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

The details of the extracted features.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The details of the features processed by FSMW.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

The top ten permissions of the frequency similarity weight value.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

The top ten intents of the frequency similarity weight value.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

The top ten hardware of the frequency similarity weight value.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

The top ten API calls of TF-IDF difference.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Some of the selected feature pairs with strong relationships.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

The details of the features processed by CAPCC.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

The details of the features processed by RFECV.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

The details of the features processed by three levels of feature selection methods.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

The influence of three levels of feature selection methods on the effect of feature set.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

The comparison with machine learning algorithms.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Fig 7.

The ROC curve of our method.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The AUCs of our method and machine learning algorithms.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 15.

The computational overhead and the number of parameters of each model.

More »

Table 15 Expand

Fig 9.

densenet_accuracy.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

densenet_loss.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

resnet_accuracy.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

resnet_loss.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

vgg16_accuracy.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

vgg16_loss.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 16.

The performance of each neural network.

More »

Table 16 Expand

Table 17.

The performance of each neural network.

More »

Table 17 Expand