Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Distribution of subjects’ lower limbs among conditions.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Unilateral leg press 45° 1RM and quadriceps femoris CSA values for RTEV and RTUV conditions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Total training volume per week at different frequencies of RTEV.

TTV, total training volume; RTEV, resistance training with equalized total training volume.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Total training volume per week at different frequencies of RTUV.

TTV, total training volume; RTUV, resistance training with unequalized total training volume. *p≤0.05.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Effect sizes with the confidence interval for 1RM (A) and CSA (B) values at different resistance training frequencies of RTEV and RTUV. ES, effect size; 1RM, maximum dynamic strength; CSA, quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area; RTEV, resistance training with equalized total training volume and; RTUV, resistance training with unequalized total training volume.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Individual percentage change in the values of 1RM (A) and CSA (B) in the RTEV. 1RM, maximum dynamic strength; CSA, quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area; RTEV, resistance training with equalized total training volume; ———, average of the percentage change 1x/week;–––––, average of the percentage 3x/week.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Individual percentage change in the values of 1RM (A) and CSA (B) in the RTUV. 1RM, maximum dynamic strength; CSA, quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area; RTUV, resistance training with unequalized total training volume; ———, average of the percentage change 1x/week;–––––, average of the percentage change 3x/week.

More »

Fig 5 Expand