Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Surveillance protocols.

EAU, European Association of Urology; TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumor; CT, computed tomography.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Patients’ background.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Recurrence-free survival (RFS), time to first recurrence in any site, and recurrence detection rate.

RFS in all patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method (A). RFS between the highest-risk and high-risk without highest-risk groups was compared using the log-rank test (B). Time to first recurrence in any site in patients with high-risk NMIBC (C) and highest-risk and high-risk without highest-risk NMIBC (D) were evaluated. Intravesical recurrence detection rate (E) and upper urinary tract (UUT) recurrence and/or metastasis detection rate (F) were evaluated. *, routine surveillance was needed (≥ 1%). **, routine surveillance was not needed (< 1%). TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumor. EAU, European Association of Urology.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Estimated surveillance cost, 10-year total surveillance cost, and detection failure.

Estimated surveillance costs per one recurrence detection (A: the European Association of Urology [EAU] guidelines-based surveillance protocol, B: the optimized surveillance protocol, and C; median costs) were evaluated. The optimized surveillance protocol promoted a 40% lower ($394,990) 10-year total surveillance cost compared to the EAU guidelines-based protocol (D). The number of patients that potentially failed recurrence detection using the optimized surveillance protocol (E). TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

More »

Fig 3 Expand