Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

CONSORT participant flow diagram.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Study participant demographic and smoking characteristics pre-randomization.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Means at baseline (visit 4)* and end of randomized phase (visit 10) for each group and results of statistical comparisons based on linear regression models.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

2A-2D. Changes in plasma cotinine, exhaled CO, daily cigarette consumption, and FTND nicotine dependence score among completers (n = 143) smoking either Usual Nicotine Content (n = 74) cigarettes or Reduced Nicotine Content (n = 69) cigarettes. * indicates statistically significant between group difference at Visit 10, controlling for Visit 4 baseline.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

3A-3D. Changes in OASIS, QIDS, PSS, and NNAL# among completers (n = 143) smoking either Usual Nicotine Content (n = 74) cigarettes or Reduced Nicotine Content (n = 69) cigarettes. * indicates statistically significant between group difference at Visit 10, controlling for Visit 4 baseline. # urine NNAL measured in randomly selected subgroup (n = 26 on RNCs and n = 25 on UNCs, evenly stratified by site and by study group), who provided urine samples at randomization (v4) and at the end of the randomized phase of the trial (v10).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The proportion of participants initially randomized to reduced nicotine content or usual nicotine content cigarettes who had quit smoking cigarettes at visit 11, and at visit 12.

*p<0.01 for comparison between proportion randomized to RNC and UNC group who reported no cigarettes smoked in the previous week with exhaled CO<10ppm.

More »

Fig 4 Expand