Table 1.
Item composition of the perceptions of team psychological safety scale.
Table 2.
Scholar’s background and TPS characteristics.
Table 3.
Characteristics of mHTI scholars’ conversation networks in 2017, 2018, and 2019.
Fig 1.
Scholars’ conversation network graphs with psychological safety homophily.
Pink represents low scores, green represents medium scores, yellow represents high scores, and red represents missing scores (NA).
Table 4.
Model convergence statistics for three years.
Table 5.
Parameter estimates of four SAOM models in 2017, 2018, and 2019.