Table 1.
Sample for each field and for the complete network.
Fig 1.
Social network of journals and EB members for the six fields.
Only the main connected component is represented.
Fig 2.
Social network of EBIs for the main connected component.
Table 2.
Metrics of the networks for the six fields and for the complete network.
Fig 3.
Connections between fields through EBIs.
White nodes represent scholars who act as members of EBs in journals of more than one field. Size of field nodes is proportional to degree (number of interdisciplinary scholars).
Table 3.
Editorial board interlockings within and between fields.
Fig 4.
Size of fields is proportional to the number of journals in the main component. Thickness of connections is proportional to the number of shared EBs.
Table 4.
Gender representation of EBs for each field and for the complete sample.
Table 5.
Differences in gender for closeness centrality for each field and for the overall network.
Fig 5.
Boxplot of closeness centrality for countries with 100 or more EB members in the sample.
Table 6.
Geographic representation of EBs for each field and for the overall network.
Fig 6.
Projection of institutions for the overall network.
Size of each node is proportional to the number of different scholars from the institution who are on EBs. Thickness of the lines is proportional to the number of common scholars in EBs between the institutions connected.
Table 7.
Institutional representation of EBs for each field and for the overall network.
Fig 7.
Projection of institutions for each field.
Size of each node is proportional to the number of different scholars from the institution in EBs. Thickness of the lines is proportional to the number of common scholars in EBs between the institutions connected.
Table 8.
Correlation between the number of scholars from each institution and the network metrics of the projection of institutions for each field and for the overall network.