Fig 1.
Selection process of study according to PRISMA 2020 guideline.
Table 1.
Characteristics of studies in this review (n = 6).
Table 2.
Intervention tool’s component regarding e-health approach, users involvement, outcome conclusion, domains of the eHealth literacy framework and quality rating (n = 6).
Fig 2.
Comparison of effectiveness of e-health intervention on the knowledge score on CC and the uptake or intention of CC screening (n = 6).
[NA = Data Not Available].
Fig 3.
A: Random-effects forest plot for studies eligible for meta-analysis regarding mean difference knowledge score on cervical cancer (n = 4). B: Random-effects forest plot for studies that used quasi-experimental & randomized control design study (n = 2). C: Random effects forest plot for studies that used pre-test and post-test design study (n = 2). D: Random effects forest plot for studies that only used an e-health intervention aid (n = 3). Box size represents study weighting. Diamond represents overall effect size and 95% CI.
Fig 4.
Funnel plot regarding mean knowledge score on cervical cancer for studies eligible for meta-analysis (n = 4).
Fig 5.
A: Random-effects forest plot for studies eligible for meta-analysis regarding the uptake or intention towards cervical cancer screening (n = 4). B: Random-effects forest plot for studies evaluated the uptake of cervical cancer screening (n = 2). Box size represents study weighting. Diamond represents overall effect size and 95% CI.
Fig 6.
Funnel plot regarding the uptake or intention towards cervical cancer screening for studies eligible for meta-analysis (n = 4).