Fig 1.
Measuring distance from the diving board at entry.
Still photo illustrating how distance of the diver from the board was measured from the recorded footage.
Fig 2.
Still photo illustrating how height of the dive was measured from the recorded footage.
Fig 3.
Measuring angle of dive entry.
Still photo illustrating how angle of diver entry to the water was measured from the recorded footage.
Fig 4.
Distribution of mean scores for diving positions.
Box plots showing the distribution of mean scores for all four possible dive positions: free, pike, straight, and tuck.
Fig 5.
Distribution of mean scores of pike position vs. other positions.
Box plots showing the distribution of mean scores once the positions free, straight, and tuck have been collapsed into the category of other.
Fig 6.
Distribution of average scores.
Box plot comparing male and female average scores.
Table 1.
Description of variables and the order they were added to the regression model.
Table 2.
The final model’s coefficients and p-values associated with the effects.
Fig 7.
Relationship of average score to degree of difficulty.
A scatter plot of Average Score vs Degree of Difficulty. Average score is on the vertical axis and degree of difficulty for each dive is on the horizontal axis. The least squares regression line has been added.
Table 3.
Places for the first three female divers in the regional competition compared to their scores on DiveMeets.
Table 4.
Actual scores and rankings of all female divers compared with rankings from using the raw measurements and the regression model.
Table 5.
Actual scores and rankings of all male divers compared with rankings from using the raw measurements and the regression model.