Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Study design and patients flow diagram.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Characteristics of the Greifer and the Axon-Hook.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Position of the Plug-In-Gait upper body model markers.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

BBT with the Greifer and the Axon-hook.

Pictures showing a transradial amputee assessed while performing the BBT in a motion analysis laboratory during the pilot phase.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 5.

Shoulder abduction with the Greifer, the Axon-Hook and the NA side during the BBT.

Significant (*p < 0.05) higher shoulder abduction with the Greifer than with the Axon-Hook and than with the NA side.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Time with shoulder abduction > 60° with the Greifer, the Axon-Hook and the NA side during the BBT.

The thick black line indicates the threshold of 10%, considered as the percentage of time in a workday above which patients are at risk of developing MSD. There was no statistical difference between the groups (p = 0.92 for mixed-design analysis of variance).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Shoulder abduction for each participant, with the Greifer and the Axon-Hook during the BBT.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Atypical compensatory strategy of participant #2.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

BBT scores with the Greifer, the Axon-Hook and the NA side.

Main effect of the “Hand” (F = 90.32; p < 0.001; ηp2 = 0.92) with a significant greater score with the NA side compared to the Axon-Hook (**p < 0.001) and to the Greifer (**p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the Greifer and the Axon-Hook (p = 0.60).

More »

Fig 9 Expand