Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Item descriptive statistics and factor loadings for the ENRICh.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Trait distributions for age and race.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison results of significant DIF among younger vs old adults and non-white vs white patients using ordinal logistic regression models.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Discrimination and difficulty parameter estimates for the ENRICh measure.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Disordered thresholds for initial analysis on 15 items with 11 response categories each displayed as 0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Loevinger’s coefficient for scalability assumption test from Mokken analysis.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Recoded thresholds for final analysis on 12 items with 3 response categories each displayed as 0-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-2.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Test information curve of the ENRICh with 12 items.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Frequency of items used in the ENRICh CAT simulation.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 5.

Results of three ENRICh CAT simulations with varied SEs.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Item information provided in specific range of full ENRICh.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 6.

Bland-Altman plot of agreement between the CAT version and the fixed-length version with 12 items of ENRICh.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Test information curves for full ENRICh with 15 items and ENRICh with 4 items.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 7.

Basic information of full ENRICh, CAT, and ENRICh-4.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Comparison of participant scores among full ENRICh, CAT, and ENRICh-4.

More »

Table 8 Expand