Table 1.
The run-length profile of proposed IAEWMAAIB control chart under various choices of λ2 when λ1 is small and ARL0 = 500.
Table 2.
The run-length profile of proposed IAEWMAAIB control chart under various choices of λ2 when λ1 is moderate and ARL0 = 500.
Table 3.
The run-length profile of proposed IAEWMAAIB control chart under various choices of λ2 when λ1 is large and ARL0 = 500.
Fig 1.
ARL profile of IAEWMAAIB, HEWMA, EWMAAIB, AEWMAAIB, IACCUSUMAIB, and CUSUMAIB control charts at ρ = 0.25, (λ, λ2) = 0.20, λ1 = 0.10 when ARL0 = 500.
Fig 2.
ARL profile of IAEWMAAIB, HEWMA, EWMAAIB, AEWMAAIB, IACCUSUMAIB, and CUSUMAIB control charts at ρ = 0.75, (λ, λ2) = 0.20, λ1 = 0.10 when ARL0 = 500.
Table 4.
The run length profile EWMAAIB, AEMWAAIB, CUSUMAIB, IACCUSUMAIB and HEWMA control charts at ARL0 = 500.
Table 5.
Overall performance measures of the existing and proposed IAEWMAAIB control charts at different values of ρ.
Table 6.
The run length profile ACCAIB, AEAIB, and MHC control charts at ARL0 = 500.
Fig 3.
ARL profile of proposed IAEWMAAIB control chart under different ρ for (λ1, λ2) = 0.10 at ARL0 = 500.
Fig 4.
AEWMAAIB chart with real-life data of glass manufacturing industry using ρ = 0.905, λ = 0.1, and ARL0 = 500.
Fig 5.
Proposed IAEWMAAIB control chart with real-life data of glass manufacturing industry using ρ = 0.905, λ1 = 0.2, λ2 = 0.1, and ARL0 = 500.
Table 7.
Application of the proposed IAEWMAAIB versus AEWMAAIB control charts for glass manufacturing data.
Fig 6.
AEWMAAIB chart with real-life data of ground water using ρ = 0.50, λ = 0.2, and ARL0 = 500.
Fig 7.
Proposed IAEWMAAIB control chart with real-life data of ground water using ρ = 0.50, λ1 = 0.2, λ2 = 0.75, and ARL0 = 500.
Table 8.
Application of the proposed IAEWMAAIB versus AEWMAAIB control charts for ground water data.