Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Descriptions of behaviors that were scored.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Representative spectrograms of nine call types of vocalizations.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Latency of aggressive behavior and normalized duration of aggressive behavior of gerbil groups during resident-intruder tests.

(A) latency of aggressive behavior in VM-VM, EM-VM, VF-VF, and MF-VF pairs. Thick horizontal bars represent medians. (B) normalized duration of aggressive behavior in VM-VM, EM-VM, VF-VF, and MF-VF pairs. Thick horizontal bars represent medians. (●, virgin male; ▲, experienced male; ○, virgin female; △, multiparous female). N.S.: Not significant, ** represents p < 0.01.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Relation between latencies of aggressive behavior and durations of aggressive behavior.

Latencies of aggressive behavior and durations of aggressive behavior were negatively correlated (●, virgin male; ▲, experienced male; ○, virgin female; △, multiparous female; rs = -0.669; p < 0.001).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Vocalizations of gerbils during resident-intruder tests.

(A) Maximum fundamental frequency and duration of each vocalization. High-frequency groups are represented by bluish symbols and low-frequency groups are represented by reddish symbols. (B) Percentages of each call type emitted during the resident-intruder test are shown.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Spectro-temporal features of nine call types.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

Numbers of two call types by during resident-intruder pairs.

(A) Numbers of high-frequency calls per minute by pair-tests. VM-VM pairs emitted high-frequency calls much more than MF-VF pairs. (B) Numbers of low-frequency calls per minute by pair-tests. MF-VF pairs emitted low-frequency calls much more than the other pairs. (C) There is a negative correlation between the numbers of high-frequency calls and that of low-frequency calls (rs = -0.413; p = 0.036). Each symbol represents calls from a single test (●, virgin male; ▲, experienced male; ○, virgin female; △, multiparous female). * represents p < 0.05. *** represents p < 0.001.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Relation between two types of calls and each behavior.

(A) Representative ethograms of each pair-test during resident-intruder tests. Ethograms for VM-VM, EM-VM, VF-VF, and MF-VF pairs were aligned from top to bottom. Bluish colors represent non-agonistic behaviors and reddish colors represent agonistic behaviors. Blue circles and red circles indicate >24.6 kHz calls and 24.6≤ kHz calls respectively. Red arrows indicate the timing when the resident initiated the first aggressive behavior. MF-VF pairs exhibited different patterns of vocalizations and behaviors. (B) The ratio of behaviors at the timing each call emitted. At the timing of high-frequency calls, agonistic interactions were rarely observed, contrary, at the timing of low-frequency calls, agonistic interactions were dominant. *** represents p < 0.001.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Relationship between two types of calls and aggressive behaviors.

(A) Distributions of latency of aggressive behavior and rate of high-frequency vocalizations. (B) Distributions of latency of aggressive behavior and rate of low-frequency vocalizations. (C) Distributions of duration of aggressive behavior and rate of high-frequency vocalizations. (D) Distributions of duration of aggressive behavior and rate of low-frequency vocalizations. Each symbol represents vocalizations from a single test (●, virgin male; ▲, experienced male; ○, virgin female; △, multiparous female). * represents p < 0.05. ** represents p < 0.01.

More »

Fig 7 Expand