Table 1.
Assignment of %FM to the "Schlegel" material, derived from different formulas of Caucasian cohorts.
Table 2.
Anthropometric and body composition characteristics of obese Europid adults (Mean ±SD).
Fig 1.
a-d: Relationship between AC/Ht vs. %FM derived by DBA and BIA method for men (Fig 1a and 1c) and women (Fig 1b and 1d). Solid line: regression line; R²: determination coefficient; r: Pearson´s correlation coefficient; SEE: standard error of estimate.
Fig 2.
a and b: Relationship of %FM derived by BIA and DBA method of men (Fig 2a) and women (Fig 2b). Solid line: regression line; R²: determination coefficient; r: Pearson´s correlation coefficient; SEE: standard error of estimate; CCC: Lin`s concordance correlation coefficients are shown.
Fig 3.
a and b: Bland-Altman plot for men (Fig 3a) and women (Fig 3b) showing limits of agreement between the values of %FM estimated by DBA system vs. those derived from BIA measurements. Bold continuous lines indicate the observed average agreement. Continuous lines indicate the line of perfect average agreement. Dashed lines indicate 95% limits of agreement.