Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Standardized settings for group AF.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Standardized settings for group CL.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Constructions.

Side and top view of the device construction for group AF (a-b) plus side and top view of the device construction for group CL (c-d).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Median, maximum, minimum, first and third percentile of abrasion of the different materials in micrometres and mean loss of material after treatment with AF and CL.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Intragroup comparison of p-values between the median abrasion of used restoration materials*.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Median, maximum, minimum, first and third percentile for Ra and Rq of the different materials in nanometres.

Roughness of materials increases after treatment with AF and CL.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Intragroup comparison of p-values between the median Ra of used restoration materials*.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Intragroup comparison of p-values between the median Rq of used restoration materials*.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 2.

Probes following air polishing (a-b) and following prophylaxis paste (c-d).

a–composite (left treated, right untreated); b–GIC (left treated, right untreated);c–composite (left untreated, right treated); d–GIC (left untreated, right treated; Red arrows mark pitting after treatment with prophylactic paste. GIC: glass ionomer cement.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Probes following air polishing (a-b) and following prophylaxis paste (c-d).

a–ceramic (left untreated, right treated); b–gold (left untreated, right treated); c–ceramic (left untreated, right treated); d–gold (left untreated, right treated); Red arrows mark pitting after treatment with prophylactic paste.

More »

Fig 3 Expand