Table 1.
Review on the last-mile delivery in the last decade.
Table 2.
Applications of the Best-Worst Method (BWM).
Table 3.
Applications of the CRITIC method.
Table 4.
Applications of the WASPAS method.
Table 5.
Consistency index [52].
Fig 1.
A flowchart of the micro-hub location selection.
Table 6.
Description of the alternatives.
Table 7.
The information about the experts.
Table 8.
Initial criteria for a decision-making process.
Table 9.
Comparison of the best alternative to others.
Table 10.
Comparison of other alternatives to the worst one.
Table 11.
Final criteria weights calculated by the best-worst method.
Table 12.
The initial CRITIC decision-making matrix.
Table 13.
Normalization of the initial decision-making matrix with the standard deviation ỽj.
Table 14.
Formulation of the mxm criteria matrix.
Table 15.
Final criteria weights calculated by the CRITIC method.
Table 16.
Hybrid criteria weights.
Table 17.
The initial input data processed by the WASPAS method.
Table 18.
Normalization of the input data.
Table 19.
Weighted decision-making matrix.
Table 20.
The final rank of the alternatives according to the parameter λ.
Fig 2.
Rank of the alternatives when λ is between intervals 0 and 1 (Source: Authors).
Fig 3.
The comparative analysis of the hybrid BWM-CRITIC-WASPAS method with TOPSIS and EDAS (Source: Authors).