Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

California feral pig hunting tags from 2017.

Each point represents a GPS location of a feral pig hunting tag, after removing duplicate locations.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Predictor layers assessed during variable selection for Maximum Entropy model building.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Final MaxEnt model predicting suitable feral pig habitat in California.

Color-coded categories represent the probability of suitable feral pig habit on a scale of almost zero (<0.01) to extremely high (0.66–0.87), based on equal intervals.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

MaxEnt response curves for the five significant variables used in the final MaxEnt model.

The response curves generated by MaxEnt show the predicted probability of suitable feral pig habitat for each individual variable per each level of the predictor. Significant layers included the minimum temperature of the coldest month (BIO6), the annual maximum green vegetation fraction (AVGMODIS), the precipitation of the wettest month (BIO13), the variation of annual precipitation (BIO15) and elevation.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Risk map demonstrating areas in California at greatest risk for contact between feral pigs and outdoor-raised domestic pigs within a 5km radius from each farm, using the Kernel Density tool in QGIS.

Colors are based on the probability of suitable feral pig habitat from the final MaxEnt model at each OPO, with sharper colors representing denser clustering of OPO.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Percentage of 305 OPO identified in each MaxEnt suitable feral pig habitat level.

The final MaxEnt model contains a probability scale of 0.00 to 0.87 and was divided into equal intervals.

More »

Table 2 Expand