Fig 1.
Simplified map of the study site, showing recording locations A, B, and C.
Design layout provided by design firm Castor et Pollux and used and edited with permission.
Table 1.
Case counts [and sound levels in dBA (LAeq,10min)] for each condition of in-situ data collection, separated by weekday-weekend, afternoon-evening, and noisy-quiet side of the space.
Table 2.
Participants’ profile for both laboratory studies (N = 20 and 14, respectively) and in situ (N = 185).
Fig 2.
Top: diagram of loudspeaker array from the side, simplified head for orientation; bottom: panoramic photograph of the room from the back right corner (original copyright: Grégoire Blanc [2019] under a CC BY 4.0 license).
Fig 3.
Panoramic photographs of the space presented at the beginning of the laboratory experiments.
Top: location A; bottom: location C (original copyright: Mariana Mejía Ahrens [2018] under a CC BY 4.0 license).
Table 3.
Questions for each of the 16 laboratory conditions.
Table 4.
Standardized factor loadings and standard errors (SE) for the retained CFA model for in situ data (N = 185).
Table 5.
Factor loadings and standard errors (SE) for the retained CFA model for laboratory data (N = 544).
Table 6.
Tests of measurement invariance between pen-and-paper (N = 224) and computer-based (N = 320).
Table 7.
Modified ANOVA-type statistics (MATS) and their resampled p-values (wild bootstrap– 1,000 iterations) for RM MANOVA over all scales (N = 544).
Fig 4.
Means and SE of all scales as a function of day, time, and location for the laboratory data (N = 544).
Fig 5.
Means and SE of all scales for each location in the laboratory (N = 544) and on site (N = 185).
Table 8.
Means and SE for scales with significant interaction effect between location and day in the laboratory (N = 544).
Table 9.
Means and SE for scales with significant interaction effect between location and time in the laboratory (N = 544).