Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

A. Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH) PCR machine at point-of-care in clinical space. B. Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH) PCR machine workflow: barcode on cartridge scanned, nasal swab added to cartridge and snapped at break point, cartridge loaded into DASH machine, and report generated on screen/printed after approximately 15 minutes.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of 313 participants with a valid Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH) SARS-CoV-2 PCR test result.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Positive (red line) and negative (green line) predictive values of Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH) SARS-CoV-2 PCR test by varying COVID-19 prevalence.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Correlation analyses for comparison of Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH) PCR and Cepheid Xpert Xpress PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Bland-Altman analyses for comparison of Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH) PCR and Cepheid Xpert Xpress PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH) PCR results compared to Cepheid Xpert Xpress (Xpert) PCR results.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH) POC PCR diagnostic performance and accuracy compared to Cepheid Xpert Xpress PCR as “gold standard”.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Summary of discordant results between Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH) and Cepheid Xpert Xpress (Xpert) PCR testing.

More »

Table 4 Expand