Fig 1.
Two bid evaluation mechanisms.
a. Offline bid evaluation. b. Online bid evaluation.
Table 1.
Performance evaluation index system of bid evaluation experts.
Table 2.
Evaluation index system of dynamic competency.
Table 3.
Semantic information and IFNs.
Table 4.
Characteristics of performance.
Table 5.
Performance of 11 bid evaluation experts.
Table 6.
Dynamic competency of 10 bid evaluation experts.
Table 7.
Findings on the importance of expert segment indices.
Table 8.
Weight interval number of performance indices by improved method.
Table 9.
Weight interval number of dynamic competency indices by improved method.
Table 10.
Normalized weight vector of performance evaluation index.
Table 11.
Normalized weight vector of final layer of dynamic competency.
Table 12.
Weight interval number of performance evaluation indices calculated in reference [49].
Table 13.
Weight interval number of dynamic competency evaluation indices in reference [49].
Table 14.
Normalized ranking weight vector of final layer of dynamic competency.
Table 15.
Dynamic competency clustering in reference [49] and this paper.
Table 16.
Comparison of clustering results of bid evaluation experts’ dynamic competency.
Table 17.
Comparison of the clustering discrimination of dynamic competency of 10 bid evaluation experts.