Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

List of art and gardening intervention sessions and participant visitation numbers.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Timeline sequence for the eight experimental art and gardening intervention sessions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) recruitment, consenting, enrollment, screening and intervention completion diagram for the gardening and art randomized controlled trial.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Study experimental design.

Self-report psychometric assessments* included the Profile of Mood States 2nd Ed. Adult Form (POMS); Perceived Stress Scale (PSS); Beck Depression Inventory 2nd Ed. (BDI-II); State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Adult Form (STAI); Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Social Activities (SPDSA) PROMIS Short Form v1.0; and SF-36v2 (SF-36) Health Survey 3rd Ed. Blood Pressure** (BP) and Heart Rate** (HR) were collected using Omron 7 Series Wrist Blood Pressure Monitors (BP652N).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Baseline characteristics for the randomly assigned art and gardening groups.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

F-Test table from a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for comparisons within each psychometric instrument assessment.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Art and gardening groups self-report psychometric assessment statistics.

Values computed from time by intervention group repeated measures pair-wise t-tests.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Treatment effect size calculations using Cohen’s dRM for repeated measures.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

POMS subscales F-Test table from a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for comparisons within each subscale assessment.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

POMS subscale statistics for the art and gardening interventions.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Treatment effect size calculations for POMS subscales using Cohen’s dRM for repeated measures.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 3.

Time course dosage responses.

(A) POMS Total Mood Disturbance. (B) PSS. (C) BDI-II. Logarithmic regression trends with respect to art or gardening interventions. Sample size varies between sessions and between groups due to missing data. Error bars represent standard error. Best-fit trend lines and equations were determined using Excel.

More »

Fig 3 Expand