Table 1.
Sociodemographic information of study sample.
Table 2.
The list of items that were included in the questionnaire.
Table 3.
Factor loadings by EFA (pattern matrix of the factors and items).
Table 4.
The descriptive statistics of penalty’s perceived justice scores in a driver sample (N = 358).
Fig 1.
Illustration of differences in evaluation of penalties for driving under the influence of alcohol.
*p value is .05. Student t test was used in analysis.
Fig 2.
Illustration of differences in evaluation of penalties for aberrant driving.
*p value is .05. Student t test was used in analysis.
Table 5.
Comparison of the perceived penalties justice in general scale between offenders and non-offenders.
Fig 3.
Illustration of differences in evaluation of penalties for speeding among offenders and non-offenders.
Table 6.
The perceived justice of the penalties for the types of speeding offences (offenders vs. non-offenders).
Fig 4.
Illustration of differences in evaluation of penalties for DUI among drivers with license suspension and monetary fines.
Fig 5.
Illustration of differences in evaluation of penalties for abberant driving among drivers with license suspension and monetary fines.