Fig 1.
Monte Carlo weights method.
Table 1.
The decision matrix: The evaluation of alternatives with respect to criteria.
Table 2.
Alternatives’ evaluation with respect to Definitions 1 and 3.
Table 3.
Alternatives’ evaluation with respect to Definition 2.
Table 4.
Alternatives’ evaluation with respect to Definition 2 and Remark 1, a fuzzy preference matrix.
Table 5.
Alternatives’ evaluation with respect to Definition 2 and Remark 1, a multiplicative preference matrix.
Table 6.
Alternatives’ rankings with respect to Definitions 1–3.
Fig 2.
Weights of criteria if A1 is the best alternative (left) and A2 is the best alternative (right).
Fig 3.
Weights of criteria if A4 is the best alternative (left) and A5 is the best alternative (right).
Fig 4.
The dependence of U(A1) mean values on N.
Table 7.
The evaluation of all turbines with respect to all criteria, normalized matrix, [48].
Table 8.
Turbines, their central weights w*, radius r and a percentage of cases in which they were ranked first.
Table 9.
Turbines and their dominance w.r.t. Definition 2.
Table 10.
The (minimal) sample size N with respect to the relative standard error p.