Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Projection data with vertical artifacts caused by bin failures in (a) can be modeled as a combination of (b) ideal projection data and (c) ring artifact in the projection data domain. Red and yellow rectangles in (c) demonstrate the adjacent and non-adjacent bins failure cases, respectively.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Proximity operators corresponding to different sparsity-induced norms.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Reconstructed images using 2 and 2-smth algorithms for the first study case.

All reconstructed images in figures hereafter are displayed with the same grayscale for consistency.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Reconstructed images in the first study case (noise-free, non-adjacent error detector bins, and angular-independent error case).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Reconstructed images in the second study case (noise-free, adjacent error detector bins, and angular-independent error case).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Reconstructed images in the third study case (noise-free, adjacent bad detector bins, and angular-dependent error case).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison of reconstruction images between the proposed algorithms and their angular constrained forms for the first study case (noise-free, non-adjacent error detector bins, and angular-independent error case).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Comparison of reconstructed images between the proposed algorithms and their angular constrained forms for the second study case (noise-free, adjacent error detector bins, and angular-independent error case).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 2.

RRMSE and SSIM values of reconstructed images by the proposed algorithms and the compared methods for the first and second study cases and the noisy data.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

RRMSE and SSIM values of reconstructed images by the proposed algorithms and the compared methods for the third study case.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 8.

Computed (a) RRMSE and (b) SSIM values versus the iteration numbers for the third study case.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Reconstructed images in the case of noisy projection data (noisy projection data, non-adjacent error detector bins, and angular-independent error case).

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Comparison of reconstructed images between the proposed algorithms and their angular constrained forms in the case of noisy projection data (noisy projection data, non-adjacent error detector bins, and angular-independent error case).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Results of the real data.

More »

Fig 11 Expand