Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Dimensions of well-being and associated MHC-SF item.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of participants.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics, continuous scores, and categorical results of the MHC-SF.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Single-factor model of the MHC-SF.

Note. GWB = general well-being.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Two-factor model of the MHC-SF.

Note. HWB = hedonic well-being, EuWB = eudaimonic well-being.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Three-factor model of the MHC-SF.

Note. EWB = emotional well-being, SWB = social well-being, PWB = psychological well-being.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

BiFactor model of the MHC-SF.

Note. GWB = general well-being, EWB = emotional well-being, SWB = social well-being, PWB = psychological well-being.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Confirmatory factor analysis fit statistics for the MHC-SF.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Standardised factor loadings, Macdonald’s omega hierarchical and specific coefficients, and explained common variance of the bifactor model of the MHC-SF (Singapore sample).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Standardised factor loadings, Macdonald’s omega hierarchical and specific coefficients, and explained common variance of the bifactor model of the MHC-SF (Australia sample).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Cronbach’s α and MacDonald’s ω reliability coefficients of MHC-SF.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Pearson’s correlations of MHC-SF and WHO-5.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Pearson’s correlations of MHC-SF and self-rated question on mental health.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Pearson’s correlations of MHC-SF and HADS.

More »

Table 10 Expand