Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

A decision tree comparing the new screening test strategy with the current screening test in UK, The Netherlands, Ireland, and Sweden.

UK: United Kingdom.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Input parameters.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Estimated costs (Euro, 2020).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Cost-effectiveness of new test strategy versus current screening strategy in exploratory scenario analyses in four participating countries, i.e. UK, The Netherlands, Ireland and Sweden.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Cost-effectiveness planes of the new screening test for preeclampsia versus current screening strategy in base-case scenario analyses in four participating countries.

UK: United Kingdom, NL: The Netherlands, IR: Ireland, SW: Sweden, PE: preeclampsia.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for the new screening test in best-case scenario analyses in a different willingness to pay thresholds ranging from €10,000 - €100,000 per preeclampsia cases averted, in four participating countries.

UK: United Kingdom, NL: The Netherlands, IR: Ireland, SW: Sweden.

More »

Fig 3 Expand