Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Screenshots of the TRIANGLE app core features.

From left to right: challenge system with activity screen based on active challenges, coaching chat with in-app questionnaire, and library with exemplary article.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Participant flow chart for the Test TRIANGLE Study.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the control and intervention group Test TRIANGLE Study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Group comparisons in the primary and secondary outcomes between the control, intervention, and per-protocol group in the Test TRIANGLE Study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

App acceptance and usage in the Test TRIANGLE Study.

N = 27, A. Results of the user Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS), black bars = non-per-protocol group (n = 13); white bars = per-protocol group (n = 12, two missing); all values as mean±standard deviation, B. Number of app activities per participant over time; n = 13 in the non-per-protocol group (top) and n = 14 in the per-protocol group (bottom); one circle per active day, circle size reflects number of activities, asterisk marks visit 2, P = participant; C. Proportion of total number of app activities over time stratified by theme D. Number of app activities per participant per time of the day, n = 13 in the non-per-protocol group (top) and n = 14 in the per-protocol group (bottom); black circles = participant activity, white circles = coach activities, one circle per active hour, circle size reflects number of activities, P = participant, E. Percent of app activities per sub-feature, black bars = participant, white bars = coach.

More »

Fig 3 Expand