Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Objectives for each meeting of the training course for the intervention providers.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mean scores compared with paired-samples t-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Percentage of correct responses for each item of the achievement test.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Mean scores for each item of the training course’s satisfaction test.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Mean scores compared with paired-samples t-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test (n = 900).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Mean scores compared with paired-samples t-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test by gender (n = 900).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Mean scores compared with paired-samples t-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test by age groups (n = 900).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Mean scores compared with paired-samples t-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up (n = 662).

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Mean scores compared with paired-samples t-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up by gender (n = 662).

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Mean scores compared with paired-samples t-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up by age group (n = 662).

More »

Table 10 Expand