Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Example of the 2013 Risk Profile for nitric acid in cleaning products.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flowchart showing the successive steps taken to identify content and strategies to redesign the 2013 BfR Risk Profile.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Summary of guiding principles for developing risk assessment communications derived from the literature review.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of suggestions on how to improve the 2013 Risk Profile from focus groups with risk assessors.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Prototype examples of V1-A and V1-B developed to communicate the severity and probability of outcomes dimensions.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Visual designs for communicating the health-based guidance value as an example.

Designs were developed and modified during different stages of the project. (A) The initial design discussed in focus groups with risk managers and lay people. (B) Design for cases where both upper and lower threshold values were possible. (C) The final version developed for the magnesium as a food supplement topic after usability tests with risk assessors.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Final version of the 2020 Risk Profile on magnesium as a food supplement, as developed after usability testing.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of changes to the initial prototype examples (V1) from focus groups with risk managers and general public.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Summary of modifications to the prototype V2 from usability tests.

More »

Table 4 Expand