Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Conjoint experimental design.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Screen shot of a vaccine decision scenario (translated into English).

Before being exposed to eight vaccine decision scenarios, respondents were exposed to (1) general information about vaccines, and (2) descriptions of the different vaccine types (see Supporting information).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

MMs for self-reported likelihood of uptake.

The figure reports the marginal mean point estimates are plotted with 95% CIs, representing the average likelihood of uptake at each vaccine attribute level. The dashed line represents the grand mean (5.11).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Subgroup analysis: Differences across different vaccine hesitant groups.

Each dot and error bar represents the MM (and its 95% CI) of vaccine attributes on self-reported likelihood of uptake for the three groups of people with varying vaccine attitudes. The dashed line represents the grand mean.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Subgroup analysis: Differences across different risk preference groups.

Each dot and error bar represents the MM (and its 95% CI) of vaccine attributes on self-reported likelihood of uptake for the two groups of people with varying risk preferences. The dashed line represents the grand mean.

More »

Fig 4 Expand