Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Finding the optimal solution by PSO.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flow chart of PSO algorithm.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

GT classification.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Algorithm flow.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparison of GDP or water use income among basin countries.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Model performance test results (a. Server occupancy time; b. Calculation waiting time).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Comparison of watershed area and runoff yield ratio in various countries.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 1.

Watershed area and corresponding runoff yield ratio of the Lancang-Mekong River Basin countries.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 8.

Comparison of crop conditions in various countries.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 2.

Crop status of five countries in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 9.

Comparison of water resources allocation in five countries.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 3.

Allocation of water resources in five countries of the Lancang-Mekong River Basin.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 10.

Comparison of grain production benefits under the water resources allocation in five countries.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 4.

Benefits of grain production under the allocation of water resources in five countries.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 11.

Profit comparison of 16 cooperation modes among China and other four countries.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 5.

Profits of 16 cooperation modes among China and other four countries.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 12.

Comparison of profits between China and other countries under 90% water inflow.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 6.

Profits of China and other countries at 90% water inflow.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 13.

Comparison of profits of 16 cooperation modes between Laos and other four countries.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 7.

Profits of 16 cooperation modes between Laos and other four countries.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 14.

Trend of total benefit under different game combinations (China).

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 8.

Benefit growth of two allocation modes in China and other countries under different game combinations and water inflow.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 15.

Profit comparison of 16 cooperation modes between Thailand and other four countries.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 9.

Profits of 16 cooperation modes between Thailand and other four countries.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 16.

Comparison of profits of 16 cooperation modes between Cambodia and other four countries.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 10.

Profits of 16 cooperation modes between Cambodia and other four countries.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 17.

Profit comparison of 16 cooperation modes between Vietnam and other four countries.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Table 11.

Profits of 16 cooperation modes between Vietnam and other four countries.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Fig 18.

Comparison of five countries’ benefits of independent water resource development.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Table 12.

Benefits of independent development of water resources in the five countries.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Fig 19.

Benefits of each member state under the cooperation of the five countries.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Table 13.

Each state’s benefits under the cooperation of the five countries.

More »

Table 13 Expand