Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary characteristics of LIFE-Adult participants considered in the present analysis.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Identification of anterior and posterior torso landmarks.

(a) Extracted data points from 3D image, (b) Identification of anterior and posterior landmarks within point slice data.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Landmarks used to segment the torso and create a local co-ordinate system within each 3D image.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Torso shape principal components (PCs).

First 9 PCs capturing 90.6% of variation in torso shape in the LIFE-Adult cohort, shown as the maximum positive (left) and negative (right) deviations from the sample mean. Blue and red regions represent areas that protrude less, or more than the average torso shape, respectively.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Correlation matrix of male participant measures.

Strength of linear relationships between traditional body measures and shape PCs for male participants. Dark red panels indicate a strong positive correlation, dark blue panels indicate a strong negative correlation, lighter panels indicate weak correlation.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Correlation matrix of female participant measures.

Strength of linear relationships between traditional body measures and shape PCs for female participants. Dark red panels indicate a strong positive correlation, dark blue panels indicate a strong negative correlation, lighter panels indicate weak correlation.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Variable importance in projection (VIP) of body measures within PLS regression models.

Comparison of calculated VIP statistic values within the PLS regression model for each torso shape PC between male and females.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Relationship between body measures and shape PCs for male participants.

(a) Predicted changes in shape PCs according to PLSR models. (b) Reconstructed torso shapes for males with waist girths of 68, 110 and 152 cm.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Relationship between body measures and shape PCs for female participants.

(a) Predicted changes in shape PCs according to PLSR models. (b) Reconstructed torso shapes for females with waist girths of 59, 102 and 143 cm.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Proportions of total torso shape variation within LIFE dataset explained and unexplained by each torso shape PC for males and females.

More »

Fig 9 Expand