Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Patient encounter selection criteria.

This schematic outlines the patient selection criteria.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Study cohort patients’ characteristics (March, 2020 –July, 2020).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Surveyed patients’ characteristics (March–July 2020).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Frequency of survey top box scores: Likert score of 4 (good) or 5 (very good).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Graph showing the frequency of trop box score of 4 or 5 by month for telenephrology responses.

Graphical illustration of satisfaction of audio, video and overall ease of communication with providers by survey month.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

How the frequency of top box score of 4 or 5 varied by month for telenephrology survey responses.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Number and percent of telenephrology visits by geography.

The figure graphically represents the plurality of locations served by telenephrology.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Patient distribution by visit type and diagnoses groups (all patients, face to face and telenephrology).

The majority of patients in the study were best characterized as CKD, however, the entire spectrum of clinical visits was supported by telenephrology.

More »

Fig 4 Expand