Fig 1.
Heat transfer network analysis of the conjugate heat transfer process.
Fig 2.
Detailed view of the device of the discrimination-experiment method.
Fig 3.
Numerical computation nodes of the discrimination-experiment method.
Fig 4.
Arrangement of test points in the experiment.
Fig 5.
Schematic illustration of the experimental setup.
Fig 6.
Partial digital photograph of the experimental setup.
Table 1.
Chemical composition (in mass %) of the austenitic 304 stainless steel.
Table 2.
Thermophysical parameters of the austenitic 304 stainless steel.
Fig 7.
Comparison between the fitting polynomials and the original parameters.
Fig 8.
Time step and space step independence tests.
Fig 9.
Comparison of and h.
Fig 10.
Comparison of and h.
Fig 11.
Comparison of hdev,ρ and h.
Fig 12.
Comparison of hdev,λ and h.
Fig 13.
Comparison of and h.
Fig 14.
Comparison of σh and h.
Fig 15.
Comparison of hcon,all and hvar y.
Fig 16.
Comparison of hcon,ρ and hvar y.
Fig 17.
Comparison of and hvar y.
Fig 18.
Comparison of hcon,λ and hvar y.
Fig 19.
Distribution and variation of the surface temperature.
Fig 20.
Distribution and variation of the convective heat transfer coefficient.
Fig 21.
Variations of .
Fig 22.
Variations of .
Fig 23.
Heat flux of the supersonic air jet impingement.
Fig 24.
Heat flux of the water jet impingement.
Fig 25.
Surface temperature at R/D = 0.
Fig 26.
Convective heat transfer coefficient at R/D = 0.
Fig 27.
Surface temperature at R/D = 2.
Fig 28.
Convective heat transfer coefficient at R/D = 2.
Fig 29.
Surface temperature at R/D = 4.
Fig 30.
Convective heat transfer coefficient at R/D = 4.
Fig 31.
Surface temperature at R/D = 6.
Fig 32.
Convective heat transfer coefficient at R/D = 6.
Table 3.
Average convective heat transfer coefficient and AD at different heat transfer positions and nozzle-to-target distances.