Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Phenotyping algorithm to generate an All-CAD phenotype and CAD free controls along with 6 sub-phenotypes of CAD.

The algorithm is designed to be run either as a complete run as presented, or as modules taking each of the sections and running individually. Where incident and prevalent MI or CAD is present a choice can be made to designate either as prevalent or incident. ICD and related Codes used within each section are provided in Supplementary Tables.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Overlap of self-reported diagnoses in UKB and those identified through EHR, for prevalent CAD or MI.

Venn diagram showing the overlap between UKB survey derived self-reported MI cases, self-reported CAD without MI cases and CAD or MI cases identified in EHR.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Kaplan Meier survival analysis for of CAD phenotypes with all-cause mortality.

Panel A shows survival curves for participants identified to have an incident CAD and MI phenotype during follow up, with baseline recorded as the date of the clinical event. Panel B shows survival curves for participants identified as having prevalent CAD and MI phenotypes, with baseline recorded as date of enrolment.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Coronary artery disease phenotypes and mortality.

Hazard ratios (HR) presented for all-cause mortality (95% C.I.) for CAD phenotypes; Adjusted for age and sex, compared to 465,155 CAD free controls (never or no CAD).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Coronary artery disease phenotypes and association with polygenic risk score for CAD.

Odds Ratios (ORs) per 1 S.D. increase in CAD PRS, (95% C.I.) for CAD phenotypes; Adjusted for age and sex, compared to 378,025 CAD free controls (never or no CAD).

More »

Fig 5 Expand