Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

During the execution of countermovement jumps, participants (A) flexed their knees such that their thighs are approximately parallel to the ground, (B) and a maximal vertical jump was then performed. (C) Lower body compression garment (FreeZone). Image source: www.free-zone.com.tw.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Definition of deoxygenation rate during fatigue period and reoxygenation rate during recovery period; CG, compression garment.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparisons of (A) jump height and (B) power between garment type and time course of change.

Error bars are standard deviation; CG, compression garment; SP, sport pants; *, p<0.05, CG compared with SP; #, p<0.05, compared with fatigue onset; ǂ, p<0.05, compared with baseline.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Comparisons of proprioception variables between garment type and time course of change (mean±SD).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparisons of SmO2% in (A) quadriceps and (B) GM between garment type and time course of change.

Error bars are standard deviation; CG, compression garment; SP, sport pants; *, p<0.05, CG compared with SP; #, p<0.05, compared with fatigue onset; ǂ, p<0.05, compared with baseline.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparisons of deoxygenation and reoxygenation rates in quadriceps and GM between the garment types.

*: Significant difference between CG and sport pants use; CG, compression garment.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Comparisons of muscle soreness (VAS) between garment type and time course of change.

(mean±SD).

More »

Table 2 Expand