Table 1.
Characteristics of the different plots.
Table 2.
Correlation of soil buffering capacity with other parameters.
Fig 1.
Soil buffering capacity of the different plots.
N, Natural soil; B, Bare soil; H, Hydropolymers; P, Pine mulch, F, Prescribed burn; S, Sludge; O, statistically significant difference from N.
Table 3.
Comparison of the buffering capacity of the N plot with other plots (t-test).
Fig 2.
CaCO3 content of the different plots.
N, Natural soil; B, Bare soil; H, Hydropolymers; P, Pine mulch, F, Prescribed burn; S, Sludge; O, statistically significant difference from N.
Table 4.
Comparison of the CaCO3 level of the N plot with other plots (t-test).
Fig 3.
pH (KCl) in the different plots.
N, Natural soil; B, Bare soil; H, Hydropolymers; P, Pine mulch, F, Prescribed burn; S, Sludge; O, statistically significant difference from N.
Table 5.
Comparison of the pH (KCl) of the N plot with other plots (t-test).
Fig 4.
Amount of organic carbon in the different plots.
N, Natural soil; B, Bare soil; H, Hydropolymers; P, Pine mulch, F, Prescribed burn; S, Sludge; O, statistically significant difference from N.
Table 6.
Comparison of the SOC of the N plot with other plots (t-test).
Fig 5.
Amount of clay in the different plots.
N, Natural soil; B, Bare soil; H, Hydropolymers; P, Pine mulch, F, Prescribed burn; S, Sludge; O, statistically significant difference from N.
Table 7.
Comparison of the clay content of the N plot with other plots (t-test).