Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Procedure of the Sort Difference Backward Elimination (SDBE) algorithm.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Gene selection procedure in the GSEA–SDBE method.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes.

The red and blue dots represent upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Genes sorted by importance in descending order.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Enrichment plots for the four gene sets (pathways) that were strongly related to breast cancer.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

Gene sets (pathways) that were strongly related to breast cancer.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 6.

Polylines of classification metrics, MCC, and ROC_AUC_score in 19 iterations.

(a) MCC as the object of difference analysis. (b) ROC_AUC_score as the object of difference analysis.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Polylines of classification metrics at the 19th iteration of the Sort Difference Backward Elimination (SDBE) algorithm.

(a) MCC as the object of difference analysis. (b) ROC_AUC_score as the object of difference analysis. Various metric lists from stage 1 of the algorithm were illustrated by red polylines (RF_improtance).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 2.

MCC as the object of difference analysis: 10-fold cross-validation classification metrics of the top three genes.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

ROC_AUC_score as the object of difference analysis: 10-fold cross-validation classification metrics of the top three genes.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 8.

Kaplan–Meier survival graphs for expression of VEGFD, TSLP, and PKMYT1.

Red and blue curves denote high-risk and low-risk groups, respectively.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 4.

Results of survival analysis for high-risk and low-risk groups according to three genes.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Information on the datasets used for performance comparison.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Classification metrics (%) of four optimization algorithms for five cancer datasets.

More »

Table 6 Expand