Table 1.
Effect of different nutrient sources and weed management practices on weed growth and nutrient uptake.
Table 2.
Effect of different nutrient sources and weed management practices on plant growth, yield attributes, and yield.
Table 3.
Effect of different nutrient sources and weed management practices on nutrient uptake by rice plants at harvest.
Fig 1.
Effect of fertilizer and weed treatment combinations on post-harvest soil pH, electrical conductivity (EC) and organic carbon content.
Fig 2.
Effect of fertilizer and weed treatment combinations on post-harvest soil macro-nutrient content.
N, nitrogen; P, phosphorus; K, potassium; VC, vermicompost; FYM, farmyard manure; BSM, brassicaceous seed meal; NC, neem cake; Fert100, full dose of N,P and K through fertilizer; Fert75-VC25, 75% of N and 100% of P and K through fertilizer with 25% N through VC; Fert75-FYM25, 75% of N and 100% of P and K through fertilizer with 25% N through FYM; Fert75-BSM25, 75% of N and 100% of P and K through fertilizer with 25% N through BSM; Fert75-NC25, 75% of N and 100% of P and K through fertilizer with 25% N through NC; Weedy, no weeding; herbicide, bispyribac-sodium 25 g/ha at 15 DAT fbmetsulfuron-methyl + chlorimuron ethyl (2+2) g/ha at 30 DAT; integrated, bensulfuron methyl + pretilachlor (60+600) g/ha at 5 DAT fb MW at 30 DAT; DAT, days after transplanting.
Table 4.
Economics for rice production per hectare (two years’ pooled data).