Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

List of tested SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RTDs and manufacturers.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Age and gender distriubion in the study group and the number of Ag-RTD and RT-qPCR positive and negative samples.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Ct value distribution of the RT-qPCR samples in the whole study group on a histogram with kernel density curve.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each examined antigen rapid test.

Point estimates with 95% exact binomial confidence intervals for sensitivity and specificity.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Ct values among true positive (both Ag-RTD and RT-qPCR positive) and false Ag-RTD negative (Ag-RTD negative but RT-qPCR positive) samples by Ag-RTDs.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Mean, median, minimum, and maximum Ct values with 95% CI observed in the case of each Ag-RTD.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Probability of a positive Ag-RTD result by positive RT-qPCR Ct values.

Probability of a true positive Ag-RTD test among Ct values with its 95% confidence interval.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Sensitivity of the ten different Ag-RTDs A. strongly positive samples (Ct ≤ 25), B. positive samples with Ct ≤ 30.

More »

Fig 5 Expand