Fig 1.
Flowchart of study participants.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of study sample.
Table 2.
Mean costs and outcomes by condition over assessments.
Table 3.
Result of the main analyses (cost-effectiveness and cost-utility) and sensitivity analyses.
Fig 2.
Cost-effectiveness plane reflecting the probability that blended ACT is cost-effective compared to CBT in terms of treatment responders.
Fig 3.
Cost-effectiveness plane reflecting the probability that blended ACT is cost-effective compared to CBT in terms of QALYs (cost-utility).
Fig 4.
Acceptability curve reflecting the probability that blended ACT is cost-effective compared to CBT in terms of QALYs (cost-utility) at different willingness-to-pay ceilings.