Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flowchart of study participants.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of study sample.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mean costs and outcomes by condition over assessments.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Result of the main analyses (cost-effectiveness and cost-utility) and sensitivity analyses.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Cost-effectiveness plane reflecting the probability that blended ACT is cost-effective compared to CBT in terms of treatment responders.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Cost-effectiveness plane reflecting the probability that blended ACT is cost-effective compared to CBT in terms of QALYs (cost-utility).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Acceptability curve reflecting the probability that blended ACT is cost-effective compared to CBT in terms of QALYs (cost-utility) at different willingness-to-pay ceilings.

More »

Fig 4 Expand