Table 1.
Stakeholder classification and examples.
Table 2.
Suggested stakeholders.
Table 3.
Suggested likert scale.
Fig 1.
Themes from internal pre- and post-doctoral researcher stakeholders.
(a) Sankey diagram and (b) stacked bar graph representing the same data of the number of mentions for each theme representing benefits and challenges/opportunities to improve mentioned by frequent users, occasional users and non-users.
Fig 2.
Themes from internal faculty/administrator stakeholders.
(a) Sankey diagram and (b) stacked bar graph representing the same data of the number of mentions for each theme representing benefits and challenges/opportunities to improve mentioned by enthusiastic supporters, cautious supporters and non-supporters.
Fig 3.
Themes from external-facing staff.
Bar graph representing the number of mentions of each theme.
Fig 4.
Themes from external partner stakeholders: Societies, foundations, non-profits.
Bar graph representing the number of mentions of each theme for themes mentioned 3 or more times.
Fig 5.
Themes from external employer stakeholders–Industry–Large and small businesses.
Bar graph representing the number of mentions of each theme for themes mentioned 3 or more times.
Fig 6.
A rapid assessment tool for internal and external stakeholders to evaluate competencies and determine strengths for engagement in career and professional development programming. Detailed instructions for entering values are in Methods, and interpretation can be found in Results. [see S5 File to download and use the stakeholder engagement tool and view proper format: https://osf.io/fc27x/?view_only=b166987514234b718d8457778651534f].