Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Distributions of parameters used in the risk assessment model generated with MCS.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Calculated EDI for TCP considering the targeted population groups.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Estimated Daily Intake of the CPF and Hazard quotient values of chlorpyrifos exposure levels in pregnant women (n = 80).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Cumulative distribution of the HQ of CPF using the guideline values suggested by A: Chronic Reference Dose (CRfDWHO), B: Acute Reference Dose (ARfDWHO), C: Chronic Reference Dose (CRfDUSEPA), D: Acute Reference Dose (ARfDUSEPA) (The result of Crystal Ball, HQ defined as a forecast, the trial number was 10,000).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Sensitivity analysis of noncarcinogenic risk for pregnant women (the result of Crystal Ball, the trial number was 10,000).

More »

Fig 3 Expand