Fig 1.
Flow diagram demonstrating the flow of studies through the review.
Fig 2.
Proportion of studies on clinical assessments with low, high or unclear risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Fig 3.
Proportion of studies on imaging diagnostics with low, high or unclear risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Table 1.
QUADAS 2- tool for the evaluation of quality of the included validity studies on clinical assessments for the measurement of leg length discrepancy (n = 25).
Table 2.
QUADAS 2- tool for the evaluation of quality of the included validity studies on imaging diagnostics for the measurement of leg length discrepancy (n = 7).
Fig 4.
Assessment of study reporting quality of the included reliability studies on clinical assessments using the QAREL- checklist.
N/A = not applicable.
Fig 5.
Assessment of study reporting quality of the included reliability studies on imaging diagnostics using the QAREL- checklist.
N/A = not applicable.
Table 3.
QAREL-checklist for the evaluation of quality of the included reliability studies on clinical assessments for the measurement of leg length discrepancy (n = 12).
Table 4.
QAREL-checklist for the evaluation of quality of the included reliability studies on imaging diagnostics for the measurement of leg length discrepancy (n = 8).