Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flowchart of patients enrolled in the excited-UA study.

Abbreviations: FAS, full analysis set; PPS, per-protocol set.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics (FAS analysis).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Changes in study endpoints in FAS analysis.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Safety endpoint.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Serial changes of urinary 8-OHdG, L-FABP, osmolality and creatinine levels at weeks 12 and 24.

Values are mean ± standard deviation. For the changes in the values 24 weeks from baseline were assessed using the paired Student’s t-test in each group. For the difference between both groups analyzed using the unpaired t-test.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Changes in NT-proBNP, LVEF, E/e’ (FAS), and TRPG (PPS) in each HFrEF and HFpEF patients.

Values are mean ± standard deviation. For the changes in the values 24 weeks from baseline were assessed using the paired Student’s t-test in each group. For the difference between both groups analyzed using the unpaired t-test. Abbreviations: HFrEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Changes in urinary 8-OHdG, L-FABP and creatinine levels in each HFrEF and HFpEF patients (FAS).

Values are mean ± standard deviation. For the changes in the values 24 weeks from baseline were assessed using the paired Student’s t-test in each group. For the difference between both groups analyzed using the unpaired t-test.

More »

Fig 4 Expand