Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Corrosion test set-up, connected to AE sensor and potentiostat for acquisition.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Carbon-steel LPR test experimental system.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Schematic flow diagram of LPR test during AE data acquisition.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

AE parameters.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Specifications of R1.5I-AST sensor.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

A flowchart of the proposed AE features extraction and classification approach.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Bias original and unbiased shifted AE signals.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Different types of AE features.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Five-layers wavelet packet decomposition tree.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Clustering processes of Support Vector Classifier (SVC).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Categorization of severity levels of uniform corrosion.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Feature extraction process of AE datasets for machine learning model.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 3.

An example of AE features set of three domains for single region.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

A summary of L-SVC model specifications utilized for simulation.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Confusion matrix utilized in our study.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 11.

Specimen sample before and after LPR test.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Feature heatmap of utilized AE dataset.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Feature importance of utilized AE dataset.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 6.

ANOVA test results for the extracted features.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 14.

Mean frequency power, frequency-domain features for three stages of corrosion.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Peak-to-Peak (V), time-domain features for three stages of corrosion.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Standard deviation, statistical features for three stages of corrosion.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 7.

Classification performance comparison between adopted L-SVC and benchmarked models.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Classification accuracy associated with error comparison between adopted L-SVC and benchmarked models.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 17.

Confusion matrix of the adopted L-SVC.

More »

Fig 17 Expand