Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Proposed theoretical model and hypotheses.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The number of latent variables as determined by the elbow method.

These plots show the number of latent variables associated with the smartphone use modes (left) and quality of life (right). The x-axis is the number of latent variables, and the y-axis is the additional variance that can be explained for each additional latent variable. Note that for the phone use factor, the elbow method determined 2 latent factors as an effective separation, while for the QOL factor, it determined 3 latent factors.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Correlation matrix of questionnaire items.

Green indicates a strong correlation, and red/yellow indicates a weaker correlation. Smartphone use behavior (A) and quality of life items (B) show a good separation, which forms two main clusters of items, one related to QOL and the other to smartphone use behavior. (C) shows weaker relationship in comparison to each individual sub-component.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Correlation coefficient between each item and the two smartphone use latent variables.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Correlation coefficient between each item and the three QOL latent variables.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

SEM models.

Smartphone usability effects on QOL (left) and its inverse model, effects of QOL on usability (right). For the direct model (left), unaware use (unw) negatively effects all three QOL measures: competence (cmp), functioning (fnc) and positive feeling (ps_), while aware use (awr) positively effects positive feelings (ps_) but does not significantly affect the functioning or competence latent variables. For the inverse model (right), the functioning (fnc) QOL latent variable negatively effects both aware (awr) and unaware (unw) usability, while competence does not significantly affect either of the latent variables of aware or unaware use; furthermore, positive feelings (ps_) positively effects the aware component of QOL but not the unaware component.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of the structural model estimates and P-values.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Distribution of QOL scores for high unaware (orange) vs. low unaware smartphone use (blue).

In (a), we plot the histograms for the entire QOL component. In (b), we plot only the positive feeling subcomponent. In (c) we only plot the competence subcomponent. Finally, in (d), we plot only the functioning subcomponent. The exact questions that construct each QOL subcomponent can be seen in Table 2, while the questions that construct smartphone usability are found in Table 3.

More »

Fig 5 Expand